Social Networking: Here to Stay?

With the onslaught of social networking websites today, we wouldn't be doing our job as researchers if we excluded them from a discussion on how to reach young people -- and the effects of social networks on everything from bands to employment to ad campaigns.

As a somewhat-recent college graduate who came of age in the Internet era, I have some experience with these sites. I have a MySpace account and a Facebook account (you'll have to "friend" me to see them, though), and an AIM screen name. In fact, the rise of social networking has some things in common with the rapid rise of Instant Messaging in the past 10 or so years.

When I was in college, if you wanted to gather some friends to go to dinner, you didn't walk down the hall to their dorm room, and you didn't call them -- you simply IMed them. If your roommate wasn't in the room and wasn't online with a posted "away message" informing you of where she was, you got worried. Essentially, if someone wasn't online, he/she might as well have been a missing person.

Of course, AIM didn't allow you to post pictures of yourself, post your phone number or address, or give the world a list of your favorite "Seinfeld" quotes. You couldn't add people to your buddy list without their screen name, and you couldn't get that unless you knew them personally.

Enter the social networking sites. I first heard of Facebook toward the end of my junior year of college, in early 2004. It was only accessible to college students, hardly anybody was on it, and most people's reactions were something like, "This sounds like a scam," or "People will just stalk you." I admit, it took awhile for me to check it out.

Now, you can't really have a discussion about these sites without bringing in another big buzzword in research -- word of mouth. People began joining Facebook because their friends were telling them about it, because they were finding people they'd been out of touch with for years, and because they were just plain curious.

Facebook now has over 58 million active users. 58 million! That's equivalent to about 19% of the U.S. population (although Facebook's membership is international). So if the question is whether this trend is here to stay, I think we can at least say that it's not going away any time soon.

I think it's not unreasonable, however, to predict that people will become more cautious about what they put online. MySpace and Facebook, for example, have in the past year or so created more privacy controls for users to designate how much of their personal information is displayed, and to whom. From a research standpoint, if that many people are "out there" on these sites, how can they be ignored? Perhaps the better question is whether the sites are actually an efficient tool for reaching respondents among all the "noise" of different applications, the clutter of colors and design layouts, and everything else these pages allow.

So what do you think -- are you actively part of a social network, and do you plan to stay that way? And will the sites stand the test of time?

TrackBacks
There are no trackbacks for this entry.

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://www.thetaylorgroup.com/blog/trackback.cfm?1C657414-1422-22E7-23A262FF7FDB182C

Comments
Jason's Gravatar You wrote: "I think it's not unreasonable, however, to predict that people will become more cautious about what they put online."

I agree, and I also think this is already happening. I've read several stories in the past year about employers weeding out undesirable candidates based on their MySpace profiles. Potential employees are starting to respond to this by aiming for a middle ground that allows them all the benefits of social networking without the pratfalls that can go along with it.
# Posted By Jason | 12/27/07 11:33 AM
Sarah's Gravatar Here's a great article from The NYT--it argues that will wear out (or has already worn out) its welcome.
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/has-fa...
# Posted By Sarah | 1/3/08 9:42 AM
Hector's Gravatar I think Social networking will stand the test of time...ask or observe our future generations (teenagers & under), what I call networking, they consider part of their culture & way of life!
# Posted By Hector | 1/15/08 5:38 PM
Jessica's Gravatar I am definitely under the impression that social networking is here to stay. I think myspace and facebook is to kids today what landlines were to kids way back when.

I recently conducted focus groups with 14-16 year-olds, and I felt as old as dirt (I'm convinced they thought I was). Granted, I'm in my late 20's, but I had no idea the important role that these social networking websites play in youth's everyday communication. Apparantly, no one in this age group emails anymore. That's sooo 2000. Calling their friends isn't even a common occurence. Instead, these sites, along with texting, have taken over.

I partly attribute the use of social networking to the multi-tasking society that these kids have grown up in. When you ask them why they use these sites or why they text friends instead of calling them, they'll tell you that it takes too much time. They just want to say what they want, and be done with it. The faster, the beter. When did picking up a phone and calling a friend start taking too much time?

My rant's over. I think social networking is here to stay -- it offers the ability to tell the world about yourself AND the option to communicate on your own time.
# Posted By Jessica | 1/18/08 10:35 AM
Mike Kronschnabel's Gravatar I think social networking sites are here to stay - though the sites that are popular today may not be the ones that stick around - facebook has had some negative publicity surrounding it's privacy practices and myspace can be slower than dial up to load if the page you are visiting is full of content and the computer you are accessing it from is an older model. What I think these types of sites are doing is redefining our niche communitities from being more geographically defined to more interest defined. Music is a good example of this - pre interweb, support for indie acts tended to be broader across music genres while being more regionally based, now the support is more defined by genre and less by locale. From a creative standpoint, I see this has had an limiting effect on some musician's exposure to different styles of music and certainly on the fan base even more so, miles still =credibility even in the online world - and if you're from a bigger, hipper community (anywhwere but home)your tastes can be even more validating. Maybe it's my age, but I tend to prefer sites like www.slamomaha.com to facebook or myspace, it's regional in nature, somewhat specific in topic and very public. I don't have to know you to interact with you. Nor do I have to share any real personal information.
# Posted By Mike Kronschnabel | 2/19/08 11:52 AM
Copyright © 2007 The Taylor Research & Consulting Group, Inc.